You might open a wiki page where we could start collecting more information, and perhaps develop a strategy.
IMHO, this is a valid issue. But, it's also an enhancement, and won't block a release. Marking it invalid doesn't seem appropriate. -Ted. On 4/21/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5739 > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-21 16:55 ------- > My concern with this bug is that it started out with a broad scope, and in the > course of its life, became even more so. I wouldn't be opposed to reopening > the more specific ones, and either marking this as invalid or renaming it to > limit its scope to checking struts-config declarations. > > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
