DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35008>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35008 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-08 18:26 ------- (In reply to comment #9) >> <component jsfid="validatorScript" componentType="..."/> >> <properties> >> <property name="functionName" type="String"/> >> </properties> >> ... >> </component> > > I don't think that this would be enough information to create a method > binding expression. There would be no way to determine the formal > parameters/ method signature. Yes, but extending it is easy. > A custom property command would provide this and keeping the xml art more > simple. But with the XML solution you have all definitions at one place and it would even be possible to generate documentation from it. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not absolutely against your solution and it could be a very powerful solution in complicated cases. What about something like this? <component jsfid="..." componentType="..."/> <properties> <property name="attribute1" type="String"/> <method name="attribute2"> <parameter type="String"> <parameter type="int"> <parameter type="boolean"> </method> <property name="attribute3" handler="aJavaClass"/> </properties> ... </component> -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
