Hmmm, I think this is the part where we say, "Thanks for volunteering, Don." :)
If you'd like to see the JEXL patch in version 1.3.0, then, please, have at it :) -Ted. On 8/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like the jexl el validator. What is holding that patch up? > > Don > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I'm not convinced that validwhen is\was such a great replacement for > > requiredif. I think it has caused as much confusion as requiredif did > Maybe > > the EL Validator thats been proposed will be better and we should hold > off > > removing requiredif until thats available as a replacement: > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34849 > > > > Niall > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:57 AM > > > > > > On 8/28/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Is requiredif deprecated? The documentation [1] indicates it is, > >>however, I can see no evidence of that in the source code. In > >>particular, the validateRequiredIf() method of o.a.s.v.FieldChecks > >>hasn't been marked as such. > > > > > > It looks like James Turner deprecated it (or intended to) in April 2003: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-dev&m=105042119528289&w=2 > > > > but as you've observed, the deprecation only happened in the docs and > > not the code. > > > > If we're all happy with validwhen as the replacement, we should get > > rid of the requiredif code, IMO. I'm not sure we need to go through > > the process of deprecating the source for another release before we do > > that. > > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > >>Whatever it is, we should at least be consistent about it. > >> > >>Don
