Sounds good from my point of view. :)
As to a structure for the distribution, would it simply be something like:
docs
lib
samples
java5
java1.4
tools
README, etc.
?
Rich
James Mitchell wrote:
My plan would be to publish the nightlies here:
http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-sandbox/
...under a new directory 'ti'
Does that sound ok?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 2, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Rich Feit wrote:
First, I just want to mention that I've never been involved in a
project where anyone's given so much thought/attention to the build
from the ground up. Thank you -- it's a pleasure! Much nicer than
rewriting the build a few months down the road.
I definitely support getting nightlies out there ASAP, for people to
play with. Is it legitimate to publish a directory 'sandbox/ti/
nightly' under struts.apache.org, or is that really off-limits while
this project is in the sandbox?
Rich
James Mitchell wrote:
I think it would be a good idea for us to discuss and decide on
the layout and build processes. The build process needs to be
documented end to end. We should identify the artifacts created,
when and why it is created. More than the simple comments that I
put in maven.xml. I will volunteer to do all of this work.
As far as using Maven, I really like what we have so far. It is
clean and efficient, but more work needs to be done. Keeping the
build and layout organized is a team effort. And I'm willing to
do all the work to keep it up to date.
We were asked a few days ago, and I was hoping to do it, but time
got away from me. When can we talk about putting nightlies
together for people to try out?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: callto://jmitchtx
On Sep 1, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Rich Feit wrote:
Hi all,
I've added a patch (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/
show_bug.cgi? id=36454) for a sample that demonstrates using JSF
as the view layer for a Ti app. It's a straight port of the
Beehive/JSF sample. It doesn't necessarily show off JSF (or JSF
best practices), but it does demonstrate the integration (e.g.,
JSF pages raising actions in Ti).
Our samples do beg the question(s):
- Should we be building a 'normal' webapp for each one,
including an ant script that will build the app? Something to
put into our distribution.
- Should we use maven to build the samples .wars only for
internal testing and perhaps for publishing the samples to a live
site?
I think we shouldn't require our users to have maven in order to
build *projects* (not our source tree). Is that reasonable, or
am I living in the past?
James - let me know if this blows up your maven structure in any
way. It seems to work, but I'm not trying to do anything from
the top level.
Thanks,
Rich
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
