I for one would have no objection to dating. That's a good compromise.
I still think a version number would be better, but a date I could
certainly live with.
The naming I still would contend is confusing though.
Why wouldn't there simply be a distro called Struts that includes Core
(which happens to map to the core subproject) and the original seven
subprojects, plus the three new ones if you want? That to me makes a
lot more sense. I would even argue that the new three should NOT be
part of the distro and should instead remain extensions, but I'm less
concerned with that than what I think is a bit of a confusing name.
Come on, we got rid of Classic, a move I definitely agree with, let's go
this next step :-)
Frank
Ted Husted wrote:
On 11/2/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I expected to see a Struts distro that combined core and flow and
scripting and whatever else that when combined formed what we know now
as Struts. Anything else would be an extension.
By a distribution I mean that we zip up subprojects that people will
probably want to use together into a single download. In the case of
ah "Struts-Core-Library" distribution, this would be Struts Core and
all the extension that are compatible with Struts Core. Right now,
that would be the original seven subprojects, plus Scripting, Flow,
and Faces.
At this point, I agree that using version numbers with a distribution
like that would be confusing, and it might be better to just date
them, like the nightly build.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
