On 11/2/05, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/2/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like the new name, but have reservations about starting with version > > 1.0.0. > > > > I know this is the first ever "Struts Core Library", but to most > > people it's just Struts, and Struts already had a 1.0 release. > > > > Yes, it's a marketing thing. :) How about Struts Core Library 1.3.0 ? > > I started to do that, but the idea was to also include the new > subprojects, like Scripting and Flow and Faces, which would start at a > 1.0.0 release. It seemed consistant to start with 1.0.0.
What if another subproject is included later? Is that possible? > And, it's *VERY* important that people realize that Struts Core > LIbrary is *not* a product, it's a distribution of products, like a > Linux distribution. That was already becoming a problem with the > Struts Classic moniker. Wasn't the Core just the core stuff, without contributed projects? You guys lost me again ;-)) > Perhaps we don't want to number the disitributions. Maybe we should > just date them, like a nighly build. > > * struts-core-library-20051102.zip No opinion. Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
