One option I've said a couple of times that isn't on that list and seems
like it isn't getting due consideration: "STRUTS"!
I really don't understand why there would be any desire or need to
change from the name in use now. As Laurie quite coherently stated
earlier today, there is already an understanding in the community that
Struts is a project, but also is a product. IMO, that should continue
to be true.
We should see:
Struts 1.3.0
...which consists of:
Core x.x.x
Tiles x.x.x
Validator x.x.x
...and so on...
I think it's fair to say that the version number of Core would always
match the version number of Struts. But the other subproject numbers
can go off and do whatever they want.
But when someone comes to get Struts, *TODAY*, they are looking for that
one download that contains everything they need. I don't see why this
should change after breaking out the subprojects.
How should the Struts version number increment? I'm not as sure about
that, but that is to me a separate question anyway. Call it Struts and
be done with it. That neatly avoids all the confusion IMO.
Frank
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 11/3/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, was "Struts
Distribution" voted down already, because I thought that was the most intuitive
name for what we are trying to do.
IIRC it was Martin's suggestion, I think it got lost in the Great
Version Debate. :)
So far we have
- Struts Classic
- Struts Core Library
- Struts Distribution
Any other options, and which do you prefer?
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
