On 11/4/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/3/05, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > One option I've said a couple of times that isn't on that list and seems > > like it isn't getting due consideration: "STRUTS"! > > > > I really don't understand why there would be any desire or need to > > change from the name in use now. As Laurie quite coherently stated > > earlier today, there is already an understanding in the community that > > Struts is a project, but also is a product. IMO, that should continue > > to be true. > > > > We should see: > > > > Struts 1.3.0 > > > > ...which consists of: > > > > Core x.x.x > > Tiles x.x.x > > Validator x.x.x > > ...and so on... > > > > I think it's fair to say that the version number of Core would always > > match the version number of Struts. But the other subproject numbers > > can go off and do whatever they want. > > > > But when someone comes to get Struts, *TODAY*, they are looking for that > > one download that contains everything they need. I don't see why this > > should change after breaking out the subprojects. > > > > How should the Struts version number increment? I'm not as sure about > > that, but that is to me a separate question anyway. Call it Struts and > > be done with it. That neatly avoids all the confusion IMO. > > > +1. I agree with all of what Frank says here. > > (Gosh, can I say that? This is unprecedented! ;)
Dam, +1 from me too :-) Niall > Martin Cooper --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
