On 11/29/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Its probably a great plan to switch to WebWork 2.2 but I still don't > > see how you can say its a "merger" if no Struts code is involved - > > merger in terms of community, but not software. > I view this merger as first, one of projects/community, and second, one of > code.
Don, does Jürgen Schrempp happen to be your brother? ;-) On 11/29/05, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Struts Ti == WebWork 2.2, with some package > > name changes. > > Ok it makes a little clearer. > So developers have a choice? > > 1) Learn the WebWork 2.x philosophy > > 2) Don't learn WW2 way but use the Struts compatibility layer > instead until it runs out of steam or is it deprecated. ...and learn Webwork *then* after all. Why not to simply say "Struts sucks, let's drop it and march together into the better future under OpenSymphony standard?" Why the need of keeping *this* community *here* instead of moving/creating community *there* ? Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
