I don't see how they are comparable though...
Unit testing will tell you if there is a bug (in either the unit test
code or the code under test), and debugging is how you go about finding
and correcting the bug.
How is one worth less than the other? And what good is unit testing
without debugging after?
Frank
netsql wrote:
Frank I think deubuging is < unit testing.
Plus it makes your code more readable.
.V
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
netsql wrote:
Pros don't waste time on this,
they do this new thing called unit testing ;-). Realy, when somone on
my team is in debuger, I pull them in my office, and required that
they improve test coverage more granular and more layers of
indircection. Debuging is a sign of low productivity in my book.
Wait... Vic, were you actually serious, or was that paragraph meant as
a joke? I actually can't tell right now :)
.V
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
