This sounds familiar :) I definitely would recommend changing the slides and title of the presentation. Just yesterday I ran in to this:
http://javasymposium.techtarget.com/html/det_descriptions.htm#McClanahanShale Changing the title to something like "Shale: the Struts Component Framework" would certainly clear this up. We need to be firm and clear on the idea that Struts has many sub-projects, and two major frameworks: an Action framework and a Component framework. Patrick On 12/16/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With some people like Craig McClanahan delivering talks at significant > conferences entitled with contrary ideas like "Is Shale the next Struts", > you might excuse people for thinking that this "subproject" ruse is > baloney. I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday and I have read all > about the Trojan Horse. > > On 12/15/05, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > By the way, the original decision to incorporate Shale as a subproject > > occurred nearly 11 months ago: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-user&m=110651419515521&w=2 > > > > -- Paul > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > -- > "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." > ~Dakota Jack~ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
