On 12/20/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The result of 'maven multiproject:site', zipped up, is 17.5 MB.

I still can't get that goal to run, so I've been building the ones I
work on individually.

--

E:\projects\Apache\struts\flow\src\java\org\apache\struts\flow\core\javascript\f
om\PageLocalScopeImpl.java:38: cannot find symbol
symbol  : class Scriptable
location: class org.apache.struts.flow.core.javascript.fom.PageLocalScopeImpl
    private Scriptable newObject() {
            ^
Note: E:\projects\Apache\struts\flow\src\java\org\apache\struts\flow\FlowAction.
java uses or overrides a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
100 errors

BUILD FAILED
File...... C:\Documents and Settings\ted_2\.maven\cache\maven-multiproject-plugi
n-1.3.1\plugin.jelly
Element... maven:reactor
Line...... 103
Column.... 9
Unable to obtain goal [site] -- C:\Documents and Settings\ted_2\.maven\cache\mav
en-java-plugin-1.5\plugin.jelly:63:48: <ant:javac> Compile failed; see the compi
ler error output for details.
Total time: 4 minutes 51 seconds
Finished at: Tue Dec 20 09:16:35 EST 2005

E:\projects\Apache\struts\build>

I've tried it from my root of Struts current and /site, with the same result.
--

> What did you have in mind to include?

If each of the other subproject distributions include their own
website documentation, like Struts Scripting does, then all we really
need to do is to zip the top-level site docs for the actual site
subproject (as opposed to the multiproject "site" maven goal). If we
did want to include the rest of the site, we wouldn't need to drag
down the site archives. The links to those could be direct to the
website rather than relative.

I'm copying the live website to a local directory now. I'd like to do
a thorough review of  what we do have online now and see if there is
any cruft we can remove. (Like some of the legacy JARs from when we
used to burst the WARs.)

But, overall, in terms of the 1.3.0 release, we're mainly waiting on
Message Resources, yes?

If that happens, and  #37301 and #37730 are still open, I'd say we
should pull the new Enhanced DynaActionForm feature and roll it.

-Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to