I'm not sure where this ended up.
Whether Resources is part of the jar in "extras" or not, I don't
think we should have a dependency on any called "extras".
"extra" (to me) means "optional". Am I wrong on this?
--
James Mitchell
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
Skype: jmitchtx
On Jan 10, 2006, at 8:39 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 1/10/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As and for an alternative, I suggest we move the classes that depend
on Resources from Extras
* http://struts.apache.org/struts-extras/apidocs/index.html
to a sandbox Extras folder until Commons Message Resources is ready.
The original vote on the 1.3.0 release plan is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113262598200002&r=1&w=2
To recap, we had one veto on the plan itself from Niall because of the
dependency on the unreleased Commons Resources library, and then one
from James on making changes to the code that's now in struts-extras.
If James is okay with moving the Resources-dependent code to the
sandbox, (or otherwise temporarily removing the dependency on
resources,) then lets do it.
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
