At 12:10 PM -0800 12/21/05, Don Brown wrote:
The package name follows the Shale and really Jakarta convention
where the TLP (Struts and Jakarta respectively) isn't included in
the package name. As for there being "one true Struts 2.0", I
believe that idea has gone by the wayside. It might be possible
someday to merge Shale and Action, but at this point, I don't think
anyone has a way forward on that. We did discuss collaborating
better between Action and Shale in areas like annotations, workflow,
etc.
Hm. I don't think I buy it. I don't know if I'd rather
org.apache.struts2 or org.apache.struts.ti or
org.apache.struts.action (with the interop problems it mya bring) but
I don't like org.apache.action.
All I meant about "the one true Struts 2.0" should have been labeled
"the one true Struts Action 2.0" -- there was a time when we
described the process as people writing working code and letting it
prove itself Struts Action 2.0, but I think that's more theoretical
at this point. Everyone who is likely to be working on any kind of
Struts Action 2.0 seems to be on-board with Titanium and the WebWork
merger, so no need to dance around that.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction" -The Ex
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
