Sorry, but I'm going to try to tweak this proposal with the hope that it makes this whole discussion even simpler:
I propose we get rid of the name Ti entirely. Just as there is no such thing as a Struts framework (Struts Shale and Struts Action, right?), I propose that from this day forth we shun the name "Ti". Instead, we agree to make what was Struts Ti phase 1 effectively Struts Action 2.0. This is no different from what Don is suggesting. On top of that I recommend we agree that Struts Ti phase 2 (flow, annotation, Rails-style development, etc) be henceforth known as Struts Action 2.x. In short, we agree that we'll do it in a future 2.x release. It may be that some of these features, like other features of Struts Action 1.x (Tiles, Tags, etc) will eventually be rolled out in to their own project, but for now I propose we just agree to move forward on Struts Action 2.x and let natural selection take place as time goes on and spinoffs potentially take place. Patrick On 12/21/05, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you everyone for your quick feedback. Based on the various > comments and discussions, I'd like to revise my proposal: > > 1. Rename Struts Ti phase 1 to Struts Action 2.0 > - Will contain WebWork, Struts migration tools, commons-chain > integration, and other small improvements > > 2. Leave Ti to explore simplified development according to original goals > - Workflow/Page Flow integration, annotation-driven development, etc > > To be determined: > - Should we make Action 2.0 /trunk or start a new branch? > > I'd like to call for a discussion and vote on the first points, leaving > the third for discussion and a future vote. > > Don > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
