How Struts committers justify the reason for 1.3 release? What is the point in 1.3 considering that WebWork / 2.0 already has interceptors and other goodies? People need time to learn how to use CoR stuff. While they learn, WebWork will push 1.x out of the window. Am I wrong? Maybe 1.3 branch should contain only bugfixes?
Another way to look at 1.3 is that some early adopters use 1.3 nightlies for quite some time already. These adopters do not need a lot of docs/samples in official release since they already are using this version. For them, official 1.3.x release will mean adoption by management. So, one might think that 1.3 is intended mostly for early adopters to please their management. Everybody else will eventually switch from 1.2 directly to 2.0. Thus, 1.3 might be seen as a release not really intended for general public. Do I get it all wrong? Apache Struts web page talks about two frameworks meaning Shale and Action, it does not differentiate between Classic and 2.0. From an outsider standpoint, does 1.3 worth investment for someone who have not used its nightlies for a year or so? One of the reasons for WebWork merger was that WebWork has almost everything that has been planned for 1.3 and 1.4. What is the point t continue 1.x development then? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
