We must have hit submit at the exact same time Michael :) -- Frank W. Zammetti Founder and Chief Software Architect Omnytex Technologies http://www.omnytex.com AIM: fzammetti Yahoo: fzammetti MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, February 16, 2006 12:39 pm, Michael Jouravlev said: > How Struts committers justify the reason for 1.3 release? What is the > point in 1.3 considering that WebWork / 2.0 already has interceptors > and other goodies? People need time to learn how to use CoR stuff. > While they learn, WebWork will push 1.x out of the window. Am I wrong? > Maybe 1.3 branch should contain only bugfixes? > > Another way to look at 1.3 is that some early adopters use 1.3 > nightlies for quite some time already. These adopters do not need a > lot of docs/samples in official release since they already are using > this version. For them, official 1.3.x release will mean adoption by > management. > > So, one might think that 1.3 is intended mostly for early adopters to > please their management. Everybody else will eventually switch from > 1.2 directly to 2.0. Thus, 1.3 might be seen as a release not really > intended for general public. > > Do I get it all wrong? Apache Struts web page talks about two > frameworks meaning Shale and Action, it does not differentiate between > Classic and 2.0. From an outsider standpoint, does 1.3 worth > investment for someone who have not used its nightlies for a year or > so? > > One of the reasons for WebWork merger was that WebWork has almost > everything that has been planned for 1.3 and 1.4. What is the point t > continue 1.x development then? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
