On 3/9/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to fix /releases.html, which is inconsistent with recent > history and sentiment. :) > > " The test build can be posted to the internal distribution directory > (svn.apache.org/struts/) and announced to the Struts DEV and PMC lists > (only!). Do not announce a test build on any other Apache lists or > link to it from an Apache website. "
+1 > Back to my motives: Shale likely won't make it past alpha until > Standalone Tiles does. > > Just so nothing comes up at the last minute, the as-yet-unnanounced > intent is to do another Shale build, and assuming it is graded alpha, > to distribute it from www.apache.org/dist/java-repository, which will > replicate to ibiblio. The way things stand, there will be no 'alpha' > modifier in the filenames, just 'shale-test-1.0.1.jar', etc. Ummm, I don't believe we want to start using modifiers again. It would just be shale-1.0.1.jar. The quality grade (including no grade) is extracurricular from the distribution file name, allowing us to adjust the grade based on actual experience. Now, if we were able to roll a tiles-1.0.0 first, and by some miracle that ever went GA, then, from what you have said, then shale-1.0.1 might be able to go GA too. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
