On 3/20/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/20/06, Phil Zoio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ted, > > > > In response to your comment: > > > > "The original Struts Action codebase suffers from design deficiencies > > that would take some effort to remedy." > > > > This may be true, but I don't believe that it is a completely lost cause. > > The work that I have been doing with Struts Java 5 extensions proves (to me > > at least) that it is possible to move from the existing 1.2 code base to > > something with compelling features and free from the issues often associated > > with the Struts Action 1. > > > > See: > > http://www.realsolve.co.uk/site/strecks/index.php > > > > Phil > > > I happened to see Phil's presentation to the JAVAWUG group in London last > Friday. There are some interesting ideas here (and they would seem > applicable in either a 1.x or 2.x Struts Action Framework context). I would > suggest thinking about an optional layer (requires JDK 1.5) on top of the > base framework that made available features like this ... similar in spirit > to what the Tiger Extensions do in Shale. > > Craig
It this case it might be easier to switch to a framework that was built with Java 5 from ground up: http://mc4j.org/confluence/display/stripes/Home Michael. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
