On 3/20/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't know if this has been mentioned, but the WebWork guys have been > doing something similar: > http://www.opensymphony.com/webwork/wikidocs/J2SE%205%20Support.html > > It'd be nice if we could come up with a common set of annotations shared > by both Action 1 and 2 (possibly Shale) along > the lines of Stripes to help transitions.
Good idea! The annotations that Shale supports today (in the Tiger Extensions library) are all JSF-specific things ... something along these lines would be a positive addition. Don Craig Craig McClanahan wrote: > > On 3/20/06, Phil Zoio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ted, > >> > >> In response to your comment: > >> > >> "The original Struts Action codebase suffers from design deficiencies > >> that would take some effort to remedy." > >> > >> This may be true, but I don't believe that it is a completely lost > cause. > >> The work that I have been doing with Struts Java 5 extensions proves > (to me > >> at least) that it is possible to move from the existing 1.2 code base > to > >> something with compelling features and free from the issues often > associated > >> with the Struts Action 1. > >> > >> See: > >> http://www.realsolve.co.uk/site/strecks/index.php > >> > >> Phil > > > > > > I happened to see Phil's presentation to the JAVAWUG group in London > last > > Friday. There are some interesting ideas here (and they would seem > > applicable in either a 1.x or 2.x Struts Action Framework context). I > would > > suggest thinking about an optional layer (requires JDK 1.5) on top of > the > > base framework that made available features like this ... similar in > spirit > > to what the Tiger Extensions do in Shale. > > > > Craig > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
