>From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>
> On 3/27/06, Craig McClanahan wrote: 
> > On 3/27/06, Niall Pemberton wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the late vote - my vote is for "alpha" quality as well, mainly 
> > > for 
> > > the same "standalone tiles is not released" reason cited by others, but 
> > > also 
> > > because of the way Commons Validator has been implemented. It appears 
> > > that 
> > > the implementation was done based on an old version of validator where 
> > > the 
> > > javascript was embedded in the XML config file. This means that 1) 
> > > maintenance of that javascript is the responsibility of Shale and 2) 
> > > upgrading to later versions of validator (such as the 1.3.0 version just 
> > > released) won't pick up bugfixes in the javascript as users would expect. 
> > > Is 
> > > there any objection to changing Shale to use the javascript from Commons 
> > > Validator? 
> > 
> > 
> > +1 ... could you file an RFE so we can implement this and track it for the 
> > release notes on the next version? 
> 
> OK Done: 
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121 
> 
> I'll try to get round to doing this in the next week or two, unless 
> someone beats me to it. 
> 

Since we are discussing validator issues, there is another an open 
validator bug that I created 
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37932)

I have not done anything with this yet.  We talked about making
a shale extension that you could create renderer decorators.  
I'm not so sure this is a great idea after discovering the 
tomahawk t:buffer component
(http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/buffer.html).
I'm thinking that if we address this issue, it should only handle
the validator javascript for a cancel button.  

We talked about using a renderer decorator to add ajax type
support to vanilla components but this could be done with the
t:buffer too. 

Any thoughts?


Gary


> Niall 
> 
> > (I also plan on reviewing the other dependencies ... for example, MyFaces 
> > should be shipping 1.1.2 any day now, and it has a fix for the bug that 
> > prevents SQL Browser from actually displaying data.) 
> > 
> > Niall 
> > 
> > 
> > Craig 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Wendy Smoak" 
> > > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:13 AM 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The vote results are as follows: 
> > > 
> > > Binding PMC Member votes: 
> > > Wendy Smoak - Alpha 
> > > Gary VanMatre - Alpha 
> > > Craig McClanahan - Alpha 
> > > 
> > > Non-binding: 
> > > Sean Schofield - Alpha 
> > > 
> > > Therefore, Shale 1.0.2 is designated as "Alpha" quality. 
> > > 
> > > Craig, as far as I can tell, there was never an announcement for Shale 
> > > 1.0.0, and it isn't in www.apache.org/dist/struts. What would you 
> > > like to see happen with this one? 
> > > 
> > > At this point, my only distribution plans are to put the test 
> > > framework jar on ibiblio (via www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository) so 
> > > that MyFaces can use it for their release. 
> > > 
> > > Thanks, 
> > > -- 
> > > Wendy 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 

Reply via email to