To add to that, Patrick and I were collaborating on "phase 2" type
features before we even thought of merging projects. After that
brainstorming session, I started talking to Patrick about one of the
ideas that came out of the conversion, like devMode, and Patrick
implemented it in WebWork. He also went on to create QuickStart, which
allows you to quickly prototype applications without a complication
step. These were the types of ideas we were wanting to explore in Ti -
ways to make the job easier for the developer.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
I think we're all still working off the original proposal.
* http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsTi
Don is simply referring to "phase 2", while most of us are still
focused on "phase 1".
-Ted.
On 3/30/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don, I think this is totally at odds with a lot of the things I've been
reading lately. Granted its been hard to separate the facts from the
noise lately (through no fault of anyone involved with the merger), but
even still...
Can I make a suggestion? Certainly for the sake of the users in both
communities, but also to be sure those doing the work are all on the
same page, I think it would be a good idea for someone to write up what
the plan actually is, and make sure everyone is on board with it. Maybe
I'm speaking out of turn and such a thing already exists, but I really
believe a lot of people are thinking this is just a Webwork rebranding,
with some additions taken from Struts, and if that isn't the case I
think it would be prudent to have a document than anyone can point to
and say "that's what we're doing, that's the plan!".
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
