In the documentation, we've been referring to "Struts Action Framework 2" to correlate with the common acronym SAF2.
I would agreed that there's no obvious reason to retrofit the numeral to SAF. -Ted. On 5/9/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wendy Smoak wrote: > The jar manifests now have 'Apache Struts Action 1 Framework' as the > Specification-Title. (Change struts/action/pom.xml if you prefer > something else.) The more I think about it, the more I don't like this title. I think it should be: Apache Struts Action. Action 2 should be named Apache Struts Action 2. Framework, IMO, is just a generic descriptor. Adding the framework in there is redundant and the "1" in the first one is just lame. We may throw around Action 1 when talking about Action 2 to help separate them, but I don't think it should be in the proper title. If no one disagrees in the next few hours, I'll change it, otherwise, I'll start a vote so we can clear this up once and for all. Don > > The included site was built with maven-site-plugin 2.0-beta-4, unlike > the 1.3.3 distribution which was built with 2.0-SNAPSHOT. This > required renaming the release notes files so the filenames would not > be truncated. > > I see that the xml-apis jar has reappeared. It's probably coming from > MyFaces this time. > > Paul, your 1-3 were addressed by reverting to the released > maven-site-plugin. #4 still needs to be done, copying the 1.2.9 > release notes over. > > Michael, Don removed the 'apps' component from the site and the quick > links are correct now (in the snapshot). The menus are controlled by > src/site/site.xml in each module if you'd like to submit changes. > > The live site (struts.apache.org/struts-action) has NOT been republished > yet. > > Please open JIRA issues for anything that you discover with this snapshot: > http://issues.apache.org/struts > > Thanks! > -- > Wendy
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
