>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > In another thread, > On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote: > > > > > However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles > > > with that kind of weight is wrong. SAT is essentially a 2.0 > > > release, and should clean up all these kinds of things (and I too > > > find the Tiles API overly cluttered, so i'm totally in favor of > > > these kinds of changes...) > > > > I agree that ST is basically a 2.0 version. > > I aim to clean it up as much as possible. I just hope we > > don't lose the user base in the process. > > Hmmm... "Tiles 2.0" ? I like it. :) >
+1 I like Tiles 2 also. 2 be or not 2 be, that is the question. Gary > No need to state the obvious -- it's clearly standing alone, since it > isn't packaged with Struts Action and has no dependencies on it. > "Tiles" vs. "Struts Tiles" should be enough to differentiate them, if > we're consistent. > > Thoughts? > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
