+1. I think that solves a lot of things.
Greg
On Jun 17, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
In another thread,
On 6/14/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Joe Germuska wrote:
> However, I realize as I write this that saddling Standalone Tiles
> with that kind of weight is wrong. SAT is essentially a 2.0
> release, and should clean up all these kinds of things (and I too
> find the Tiles API overly cluttered, so i'm totally in favor of
> these kinds of changes...)
I agree that ST is basically a 2.0 version.
I aim to clean it up as much as possible. I just hope we
don't lose the user base in the process.
Hmmm... "Tiles 2.0" ? I like it. :)
No need to state the obvious -- it's clearly standing alone, since it
isn't packaged with Struts Action and has no dependencies on it.
"Tiles" vs. "Struts Tiles" should be enough to differentiate them, if
we're consistent.
Thoughts?
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
