My only concern is WW 2.2 migrations. If it will require them to
perform significant work (more than a simple rename), we should just
deprecate the feature and perhaps throw a warning. Otherwise, I think
we should remove it.
Don
tm jee wrote:
Hi guys,
Just want to confirm something. Is it correct to say that we have come to a
conclusion as to remove support of AroundInterceptor and support for doXXX
action method call as a fall back after xXX method is not found?
If so, we should make the changes towards XWork2 (the XWork CVS Head), am I
right?
Thanks
rgds
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
