To me it makes more sense to have an Apache Faces TLP
with lot's of subprojects. MyFaces as TLP is sometimes confusing too. Why all these component libs. For instance you can't mix Tobago with Tomahawk. ... but you can use Tobago with each JSF impl so, hey I am +1 for a Apache Faces TLP and +1 for having Shale its place there in. -Matthias On 6/22/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/22/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about a "generic" Faces project, like portals or ws ? > Apache Faces. > > To me Shale fits fine into that. > > There - in an apache faces land - is enough space for: > Myfaces > Tomahawk > Tobago > Shale > Sandbox (well, our sandbox) > and soon Trinidad (aka ADF Faces donation) > > WDYT ? As far as I can tell, you've just proposed adding Shale and renaming the MyFaces project to just 'Faces'. :) Everything you listed (except Shale) is already at MyFaces, or coming soon. And I agree, Shale is a better fit with that list. -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
