On 7/18/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like core better because it fits our naming conventions better and aligns with the JSTL convention.
I'd suggest that it aligns a bit too much. If we use "core" in the URI, there will be a tedency to refer to the "core tags", which will be confused with the JSTL core tags. There was talk before about calling these critters the "Struts Tags", so why not go with that?
As for the module names, what about we rename the artifact id's to simply "core", "apps", and "extras", then use the "jarName" property [1] of the jar plugin to specify the full "struts-*-VERSION.jar" name?
Would that work with future releases of 1.x too? My problem is that I'm easily confused. I've been working with SVN from the command line lately, and I even confuse "$ svn" with "$ mvn". -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
