Yes, another good example of an area I need to revisit. I'll wrap these
two items up in a new ticket.
Don
Matt Raible wrote:
On 8/30/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/30/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The jasper reports result _should_ be there,
Why?
> however, we do need to
> reduce the warn message to perhaps an info. The idea is we should
list
> results that may not be available to make it easy to use the new
results
> when the struts-extras.jar is present.
It's already easy to add new results to any package. I don't think we
should go overboard by trying to bundle everything into the default
package. People who use JSF or JasperReport results can just add them
to their own package.
I think it's OK that they're there, as long as users aren't *aware*
they're there. Here's what I get in regards to JSF:
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.FacesSetupInterceptor at interceptor
- jar:file
:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/strut
s2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:54:97 probably due to a
missing j
ar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the jsfSetup interceptor
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.RestoreViewInterceptor at interceptor
- jar:fil
e:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/stru
ts2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:55:100 probably due to
a missing
jar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the jsfRestore
interceptor
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.ApplyRequestValuesInterceptor at
interceptor -
jar:file:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/l
ib/struts2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:56:105 probably
due to a
missing jar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the jsfApply
intercept
or
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.ProcessValidationsInterceptor at
interceptor -
jar:file:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/l
ib/struts2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:57:108 probably
due to a
missing jar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the
jsfValidate interc
eptor
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.UpdateModelValuesInterceptor at
interceptor - j
ar:file:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/li
b/struts2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:58:105 probably
due to a m
issing jar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the jsfUpdate
intercept
or
WARN - InterceptorBuilder.constructInterceptorReference(59) | Unable
to load con
fig class org.apache.struts2.jsf.InvokeApplicationInterceptor at
interceptor - j
ar:file:/Users/mraible/Work/appfuse/web/struts-war/target/work/webapp/WEB-INF/li
b/struts2-core-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar!/struts-default.xml:59:105 probably
due to a m
issing jar, which might be fine if you never plan to use the jsfInvoke
intercept
or
I think it'd be best if I didn't have to add results to my struts.xml
- I'd prefer that they're available when I add the appropriate
dependencies (i.e. JasperReports or MyFaces). I'd be more than happy
to see a warning if I tried to use one of these results and I didn't
have the dependent JARs in my classpath.
Matt
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
