Yeah, I can accept that definition.
Greg
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:40 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Greg Reddin ha scritto:
I don't know. Having used Tiles for a while, I'm used to the way
things are. It doesn't bother me to use the same overloaded tag
in two different ways. I'm not sure if it's confusing to the
users or not.
I don't know if it's the same for you, but in my mind a "tile" can
be a page, a definition or a string. A layout page is like a tile
pattern, <tiles:insert type="attribute"/> tags are like tile gaps,
and the surrounding HTML code is made of tile joints...
Sorry for this building analogy :-)
What I mean is that the concept of attribute is that it is so
different from the "tile" analogy, i.e. you put a tile (definition,
page, string) where there is a tile gap (attribute).
I hope that I have been clearer now :-)
Ciao
Antonio
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
