Musachy send me the required files via email.

I am currently in progress of incorporating the patches into the locally
updated repo. I'll work further on these over the weekend, so that dojo
0.4 with (hopefully) working ajax tags should be in place until monday.

regards,
Rainer

> Does this list accept attachments? It got rejected as spam :)
>
> Rainer Hermanns wrote:
>> No idea, just zip together the newly created dir and I'll add the files
>> individually :)
>>
>> tia,
>> Rainer
>>
>>
>>> You are right, the patch doesn't include the new files inside the added
>>> folder, I can't figure out how to make svn create a patch with the
>>> added
>>> folder, it keeps complaining:
>>>
>>> "Files inside the added folder won't be included ...."
>>>
>>> Am I doing something wrong or this is a svn/patch limitation?
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>> Rainer Hermanns wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ah, okay... So it looks like the complete folder with all moved widget
>>>> files
>>>> is missing. The patch does not create the folder, nor does it create
>>>> the
>>>> "new/moved" template files.
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your help,
>>>> Rainer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I will take a look tomorrow (not on my box right now), but I do
>>>>> remember
>>>>> that I changed the widgets to struts.widget from struts.widgets, for
>>>>> 2
>>>>> reasons, 1. Keep consistency with Dojo (not that we had to anyway)
>>>>> and
>>>>> 2.
>>>>> Dojo 0.4 by default assumes the widgets to be on a subdir "widget"
>>>>> which
>>>>> requires less configuration. I will let you know  tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> musachy
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Musachy,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> after applying your patch, all custom widget files do no longer have
>>>>>> content.
>>>>>> Is it correct, that all files under core/src/main/resources/org/
>>>>>> apache/struts2/static/dojo/struts/widget/ should be removed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If yes, shouldn't core/src/main/resources/template/ajax/
>>>>>> dojoRequire.js should be changed like this (remove all lines with
>>>>>> '-'
>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dojo.require("dojo.io.BrowserIO");
>>>>>> dojo.require("dojo.event.topic");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - dojo.hostenv.setModulePrefix('struts', 'struts');
>>>>>> dojo.require('dojo.widget.*');
>>>>>> - dojo.widget.manager.registerWidgetPackage('struts.widget');
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - dojo.require("struts.widget.Bind");
>>>>>> - dojo.require("struts.widget.BindDiv");
>>>>>> - dojo.require("struts.widget.BindAnchor");
>>>>>> dojo.require("dojo.widget.Editor");
>>>>>> dojo.hostenv.writeIncludes(); // not needed, but allows the Venkman
>>>>>> debugger to work with the includes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks to me, that either the patch is not complete, or that I am
>>>>>> missing the part replacing the above widget requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please have a look at this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to