--- Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When we started the taglib generation in ww2, we had > to tweak the xdoclet templates and a little bit of > code because the meta information had to be in the > component sources rather than the Tag-classes. > Because of the dual use of the components > (fm-support), the real logic sits there while the > Tag classes are simple wrappers. Also I remenber > there were some small issues with html artifact > generation. We could not get xdoclet to go without > tweaking it. Well, XD2 plugin is way easier to tweak as XD1 - as now there is sane templating language ( jelly in case of TLD, and everything XML ) and formal tag definition. Usually you would put metadata on wrapper classes, but it is also possible to walk down the hierarchy and gather metadata from there. > Maybe Konstantin could bring some light into whether > standard xd2 taglib doclet would deliver this > flexibility. Also, the idea of using real > annotations, while doing generation with xd2, does > not sound that bad, if it would help us to get > things out the door more quickly. Well, there is no "doclet" anymore - there are plugins. For using real annotations one would need to write different metadata provider ( which would reside / or be related to generama ) and use it instead. Though I can not predict how much work it would be ;) regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $310k for $999/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
