Rene, is there any reason this code should go into Struts 2 core? Does it need to referenced at runtime? I thought you were using these annotations at compile time, which AFAIK, means they won't be included in the compiled code, so there would be no reason to include the annotation code in the jar.
I think this should be pushed out to a new Maven 2 plugin, perhaps under /struts/maven instead of Struts 2. Don On 11/21/06, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I committed Musachy's patch with some modifications, so that the annotations are in place as well as the apt generation code, so we all can give it a review. Maybe we will have to do some more changes, but it looks quite straight forward in the first place. Converting doc-tags to annotations is supposed to be a dirty job, I've done some tests and will continue tomorrow. May the regexes be with us ... :) Nonetheless, we still can work "on both ends", giving both the apt and xd2 a try while having common meta information convention. I was not able to look into Konstantins patch yet, but I will do ASAP after doing the conversion stuff. Regards, Rene > I have everything working fine, but I'm waiting to > get home and retest > it on linux before submitting. > > musachy > > Ted Husted wrote: > > Likewise. Either will be fine with me. From the > other thread, I think > > Rene was going to look at apt again later today. > > > > -Ted. > > > > On 11/20/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I believe whoever is planning on doing the actual > commit decides..... I > >> call "not it!" :) > >> > >> Don > >> > >> James Mitchell wrote: > >> > >> > I was under the impression that we were going to > use apt. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > James Mitchell > >> > 678.910.8017 > > > >> > > >> > On Nov 19, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Musachy Barroso > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Are we finally going to stick to xdoclet or use > annotations? I have > >> >> the > >> >> maven-apt plugin almost ready(from tobago > project + some fixes) > >> >> with the > >> >> apt stuff, but I don't want to spend more time > on it if we are not > >> >> going to > >> >> use it. > >> >> > >> >> regards > >> >> musachy > >> >> > >> >> On 11/18/06, Konstantin Priblouda > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> HI all, > >> >>> > >> >>> I just created an issue containing patch to > pom.xml > >> >>> to enable tld-generation by xdoclet-2 > >> >>> ( WW-1512 ) > >> >>> > >> >>> feel free to ask questions. > >> >>> > >> >>> regards, > >> >>> > >> >>> ----[ Konstantin Pribluda > http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- > >> >>> Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is > released and of production > >> >>> quality. > >> >>> check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org > >> >>> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > --------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=50761&messageID=102782#102782 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
