On 12/1/06, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Cooper ha scritto: > On 12/1/06, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Craig McClanahan ha scritto: >> > The Dimensions code is going to have to go through >> > the Incubator -- even though its likely that this can go very quickly, >> > there >> > is no reason to mess up the progress of the Tiles TLP proposal by >> > trying to >> > do them together. >> >> Hi Craig, when I wrote "at the same time" I did not mean "together". >> Since probably Dimensions will become a subproject of Tiles TLP > If Dimensions would ultimately be merged into Tiles, that is one > thing, and > that might be fine. If, however, you are thinking that Dimensions > would live > as a "similar concept but separate framework" to Tiles, but within the > same > TLP, that is quite another thing, and not something I would like to > see, not > to mention the ASF Board. I see. In this case Dimensions does not exist without Tiles: maybe the concept of "subproject" is wrong, it should be considered literally an extension (it contains a lot of classes that extend Tiles ones), or a component. Is the concept of "component" or "extension" incompatible with possible incubation into Tiles TLP?
No. If it would be a component of Tiles or an extension to it, that would be a natural fit and would be fine. But I think we've all agreed now that we should table this discussion until a Tiles TLP is up and running. :-) -- Martin Cooper Thanks
Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
