I'd suggest we don't include the static DatePicker and TimerPicker for
2.0.2, these are not the dropdown ones. They were not in WW, and they
have some serious issues (Dojo code) which I would need more time to
work on. That would leave us with the DropDownDateTimePicker, which we
could split if you guys think is better. I have a patch for
DropDownDateTimePicker, should I wait until the spin off?
regards
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
The only currently broken tag, in terms of 2.0.1 compatibility, is the
date picker tag. It has been reimplemented and renamed. Am I missing
any?
Don
David H. DeWolf wrote:
Unless I'm missing something, that would mean we break backwards
compatibility between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 and then force another break
between 2.0.2 and 2.0.3, right? I want to get 2.0.2 out as well, but
that doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Why not roll back the tags to 2.0.1 compatibility and then release?
David
Ted Husted wrote:
On 12/27/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to move on this quickly and have it completed within two
weeks.
Thoughts?
Do we want to release Struts 2.0.2 with what we have already?
A Struts 2.0.3 is already a foregone conclusion since XWork 2 is at
RC1.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
