Yeah, that's an interesting problem, cause would we tag all of
struts/maven? Do we tag individual projects along side the regular core
tag? They have the same 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT version.
Wendy, what's the best way to handle this?
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
So, if we're dependant on this version of struts-annotations, I'm
thinking we should tag it too. I deployed it at r498040. Just not sure
what to call it.
STRUTS_2_0_3_STRUTS-ANNOTATIONS ?
-T
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/19/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, cool, maybe it has been fixed. Well, I deployed the snapshot so
> > hopefully this doesn't happen again.
>
> When I tried it clean, without deploying the struts-annotations
> separately, it did not generate the TLD.
>
> When I tried it clean again, with deploying the struts-annotations
> first, it did generate the TLD, but I don't see the TLD in the JAR.
>
> I'll try the HEAD with the in-place JAR to see if that gets bundled.
OK, against the head the TLD is included. To move forward, I'll re-tag
against the head, and run 2.0.3.
As they say, the third time is the charm :)
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
