On 2/21/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, honestly, if this issue has been lurking for so long, undoubtedly, there are going to be others. But, we are not going to catch those until more people try the product. At this point, I don't believe we are going to hook many more people with beta releases. The best strategy might be to prepare for a succession of bi-weekly milestones, which would hopefully proceed directly to GA.
I completely agree. It is unrealistic for an active project that uses this particular release process to find/fix zero bugs and make zero improvements from the time the test build is created to when it is voted upon. The metric should be, even knowing what you do, if you tested the release and find it meets your standard of quality. Since this particular issue was present in WW for many GA releases, I don't think it should affect the quality vote for this release, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't roll 2.0.7quickly and also possibly make it GA. Remember, a release isn't about perfect; if we get super picky, we'll never get a GA release out. It is about determining if you would put this code into production for your applications. Don Of course, in the meantime, the trunk is open for 2.1.x development.
From prior discussions, the big tickets there seem to be extracting Ajax/Dojo and portlets to plugins. IMHO, those changes alone would be enough to get stared on the next series. -Ted. On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After all, if we plan to push out a 2.0.7 within one or two weeks after > doing 2.0.6 GA, the problem might not be that big. But if it takes longer, > I would still vote for not labeling 2.0.6 for GA. > > - Rene > > > > > On 2/21/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Am Di, 20.02.2007, 16:17, schrieb Nate Drake: > >> > [X] Beta > >> > > >> > > >> > Due to WW-1747. > >> > > >> > >> Finally, WW-1747 and the related issues should be fixed now. We've now > >> got > >> additional tests in place for all reported issues, and they all pass > >> (yes, > >> even no broken build 8-). > >> > >> My vote is > >> > >> [x] Beta > >> for 2.0.6 as is > >> > >> [x] GA > >> for 2.0.6 with WW-1747 patch included (2.0.7 ?) > >> > >> Regards, > >> - Rene > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
