On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a > (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still might need maintainance,
True, but we now have both 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 on the roadmap. We should also take a critical look at any ticket on the 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 roadmaps and consider whether it is a "maintenance" issue or not. Several issues were simply put under 2.0.x by default and might not be considered "maintenance" issues in light of an active 2.1.x series. > For the testing of a 2.1 release, I'll be happy to test some of the said > customer projects against it. If you could try that against the head in a development environment, it might give us a heads-up before the roll. I'll do the same in a new application I'm about to start. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
