I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far.

musachy

On 8/22/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a
> > (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still might need maintainance,
>
> True, but we now have both 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 on the roadmap. We should
> also take a critical look at any ticket on the 2.0.10 and 2.0.11
> roadmaps and consider whether it is a "maintenance" issue or not.
> Several issues were simply put under 2.0.x by default and might not be
> considered "maintenance" issues in light of an active 2.1.x series.
>
>
> > For the testing of a 2.1 release, I'll be happy to test some of the said
> > customer projects against it.
>
> If you could try that against the head in a development environment,
> it might give us a heads-up before the roll.  I'll do the same in a
> new application I'm about to start.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to