I'm using 2.1 on development, and it is working fine so far. musachy
On 8/22/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/07, Rene Gielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2.1 is not a simple drop in replacement for 2.0.x AFAICS. I would expect a > > (hopefully short time) where the 2.0.x tree still might need maintainance, > > True, but we now have both 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 on the roadmap. We should > also take a critical look at any ticket on the 2.0.10 and 2.0.11 > roadmaps and consider whether it is a "maintenance" issue or not. > Several issues were simply put under 2.0.x by default and might not be > considered "maintenance" issues in light of an active 2.1.x series. > > > > For the testing of a 2.1 release, I'll be happy to test some of the said > > customer projects against it. > > If you could try that against the head in a development environment, > it might give us a heads-up before the roll. I'll do the same in a > new application I'm about to start. > > -Ted. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]