If other committers haven't chimed in (or want to chime in again :-) )
please do. I think I will be making these changes eventually:

* Move "el" project to "dormant" subfolder
* Move "faces" project to "dormant" subfolder
* Add a profile that builds them specifically
* Up to the future whether the profile is included in the release build.

Paul

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I started this poll because it is, to Wendy's point, double work to
> maintain the tag libraries. For every change, I have to update two source
> files -- either two Java or two TLD. Because people have noticed in the past
> when the two libraries are not in sync, I was looking for a way to "move
> forward" but not kill anyone in the water. Just looking for a good
> answer....
>
> Would a better compromise be to move them into a dormant subproject (like
> apps)? I'd also like to do this with the "faces" module too, since Craig was
> the only committer and dropped support years ago. I am more than willing to
> continue releasing them as such, but do want to relegate them to
> second-class projects.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Niall Pemberton
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I guess I'm just wondering what harm does it do leaving it in the
>> > release and the benefit is that it allows people with legacy apps
>> > dependant on it to upgrade with no pain.
>>
>> It seems to require double work to maintain both taglibs.  As long as
>> someone is willing to do that work, it can stay...
>>
>> Honestly, how many apps do you think will upgrade to 1.4?  I bet most
>> of them are still back on 1.1/1.2, and aren't going anywhere. :)
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to