If other committers haven't chimed in (or want to chime in again :-) ) please do. I think I will be making these changes eventually:
* Move "el" project to "dormant" subfolder * Move "faces" project to "dormant" subfolder * Add a profile that builds them specifically * Up to the future whether the profile is included in the release build. Paul On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I started this poll because it is, to Wendy's point, double work to > maintain the tag libraries. For every change, I have to update two source > files -- either two Java or two TLD. Because people have noticed in the past > when the two libraries are not in sync, I was looking for a way to "move > forward" but not kill anyone in the water. Just looking for a good > answer.... > > Would a better compromise be to move them into a dormant subproject (like > apps)? I'd also like to do this with the "faces" module too, since Craig was > the only committer and dropped support years ago. I am more than willing to > continue releasing them as such, but do want to relegate them to > second-class projects. > > Paul > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Niall Pemberton >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I guess I'm just wondering what harm does it do leaving it in the >> > release and the benefit is that it allows people with legacy apps >> > dependant on it to upgrade with no pain. >> >> It seems to require double work to maintain both taglibs. As long as >> someone is willing to do that work, it can stay... >> >> Honestly, how many apps do you think will upgrade to 1.4? I bet most >> of them are still back on 1.1/1.2, and aren't going anywhere. :) >> >> -- >> Wendy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >
