As has already been pointed out, we already have a location for dormant projects. It's called "archive". I am opposed (-1, if you must) on having two locations for inactive sub-projects.
-- Martin Cooper On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If other committers haven't chimed in (or want to chime in again :-) ) > please do. I think I will be making these changes eventually: > > * Move "el" project to "dormant" subfolder > * Move "faces" project to "dormant" subfolder > * Add a profile that builds them specifically > * Up to the future whether the profile is included in the release build. > > Paul > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I started this poll because it is, to Wendy's point, double work to > > maintain the tag libraries. For every change, I have to update two source > > files -- either two Java or two TLD. Because people have noticed in the > past > > when the two libraries are not in sync, I was looking for a way to "move > > forward" but not kill anyone in the water. Just looking for a good > > answer.... > > > > Would a better compromise be to move them into a dormant subproject (like > > apps)? I'd also like to do this with the "faces" module too, since Craig > was > > the only committer and dropped support years ago. I am more than willing > to > > continue releasing them as such, but do want to relegate them to > > second-class projects. > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Niall Pemberton > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > I guess I'm just wondering what harm does it do leaving it in the > >> > release and the benefit is that it allows people with legacy apps > >> > dependant on it to upgrade with no pain. > >> > >> It seems to require double work to maintain both taglibs. As long as > >> someone is willing to do that work, it can stay... > >> > >> Honestly, how many apps do you think will upgrade to 1.4? I bet most > >> of them are still back on 1.1/1.2, and aren't going anywhere. :) > >> > >> -- > >> Wendy > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > >
