On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not comfortable with the "../xwork" assumption, as it breaks my directory
> structure, though,
> and I'd prefer XWork and S2 to be less coupled.
+1, that's not where I want it checked out, either.
Consider using a property like ${xwork.working.copy} so that each
developer can set the location. (Provide a default in the pom, then
each developer can override it in settings.xml if desired.)
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
