On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not comfortable with the "../xwork" assumption, as it breaks my directory > structure, though, > and I'd prefer XWork and S2 to be less coupled. +1, that's not where I want it checked out, either. Consider using a property like ${xwork.working.copy} so that each developer can set the location. (Provide a default in the pom, then each developer can override it in settings.xml if desired.) -- Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]