On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm not comfortable with the "../xwork" assumption, as it breaks my directory 
> structure, though,
> and I'd prefer XWork and S2 to be less coupled.

+1, that's not where I want it checked out, either.

Consider using a property like ${xwork.working.copy} so that each
developer can set the location.  (Provide a default in the pom, then
each developer can override it in settings.xml if desired.)

-- 
Wendy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to