Sure, this wouldn't go in till at least 2.2, but just wanted to see what others thought about it as solution to our tag problem.
Don On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 4:37 PM, dusty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sounds good to me, but is it just the latest and greatest? Should we wait a > bit and get some of the other stuff ready and out in the wild? > > > > Don Brown wrote: >> >> It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in >> many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML >> Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source yesterday or so. There >> is a lot to like in GXP like type safety, speed, correct HTML >> generation, automatic support for HTML and XHTML (one of our frequent >> tickets), automatic encoding of untrusted content, and even things >> like mulitiple language support. >> >> This might be a perfect replacement for Freemarker in our tags as the >> templates can be compiled, have better error reporting, don't >> introduce yet another expression language, and solve a number of our >> outstanding feature requests around tags. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Don >> >> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gxp/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-s2--Google-XML-Pages-%28GXP%29-to-replace-Freemarker-in-tags--tp18663215p18663916.html > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
