I Like it very much, from what I can tell from a first glance. In
addition to the interesting features, it should be nice to work with an
IDE like IDEA (which still lacks fm support).

Al Sutton schrieb:
> P.S. If you want to know more about GXP there is a history available
> from
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-xml-pages-functional-markup.html
> 
> 
> Al Sutton wrote:
>> Gets my vote. GXP will have had "real-world" thrashing and monitoring
>> whereas as we've seen recently freemarkers scalability issues aren't
>> always found and fixed that quickly.
>>
>> Al.
>>
>> Don Brown wrote:
>>> It is pretty well known that Google uses WebWork 2 and Struts 2 in
>>> many of its applications, but for the view layer, they use Google XML
>>> Pages (GXP) [1], which was just opened source yesterday or so.  There
>>> is a lot to like in GXP like type safety, speed, correct HTML
>>> generation, automatic support for HTML and XHTML (one of our frequent
>>> tickets), automatic encoding of untrusted content, and even things
>>> like mulitiple language support.
>>>
>>> This might be a perfect replacement for Freemarker in our tags as the
>>> templates can be compiled, have better error reporting, don't
>>> introduce yet another expression language, and solve a number of our
>>> outstanding feature requests around tags.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Don
>>>
>>> [1] http://code.google.com/p/gxp/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to