For me, it's the "real world apps", *plus* the interest in porting GXP to other platforms, like C++, and Ruby. Personally, I'd like to add C# to that list. ASPX, like JSF, has its charms, but many .NET developers (including me) would like alternatives.
I do find the zipscript YUI examples interesting, since we are also looking for an alternative approach to supporting Ajax with the Struts tags. -Ted. On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joe, > > My main reason for backing GXP is that it's been used in high volume "real > world" apps by Google and so has been proven to scale. > > Does ZipScript have the same real world testing, and if so where is it used? > > Al. > > > Joe Hudson wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> With all the talk about GXP, I wanted to let you know about another >> template engine called ZipScript (zipscript.org). >> >> Ok, you're probably saying... another one??? but this has some >> distinct advantages and I would love for you to give it a try - I >> really think you'll be happy you did. >> >> 1) it can be used to create complex UI components >> 2) it has a powerful non XML-based syntax (which is helpful since the >> most common output is XML) >> 3) it can also be used to get more than just text from expressions >> (like booleans or objects) - great for having smarter config >> properties >> >> >> Here are some quick links: >> - homepage: >> http://zipscript.googlecode.com >> - Yahoo! UI macro examples: >> http://code.google.com/p/zipscript/wiki/YUIMacros >> - Language Syntax Examples >> http://code.google.com/p/zipscript/wiki/SyntaxExamples >> >> Thanks >> >> Joe Hudson --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
