Good idea.
On Jan 26, 2013 12:57 PM, "Lukasz Lenart" <[email protected]> wrote:

> What about moving all the releases under /release and add redirects to
> keep the old structure? Eg.:
>
> /1.3.10 -> redirect -> /release/1.3.10
> /2.3.8 -> redirect -> /release/2.3.8
>
> We'll have just one unmanaged directory in extpaths.txt -> release
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> 2013/1/22 Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>:
> > 2013/1/22 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>:
> >> No objects. While I personally prefer 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, I won't stand in
> the
> >> way of your choices. :-)
> >
> > Opinions of others are always important :-)
> >
> > I thought about the same but it looks a bit strange to me:
> > /1.x/1.3.10/
> > /2.x/2.2.1.1/
> >
> > but the same as these:
> > /1/1.3.10/
> > /2/2.2.1.1/
> >
> > looks like the current is the best :-)
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Łukasz
> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to