Sounds good. On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2013/1/31 Paul Benedict <[email protected]>: > > Is there a space issue that infrastructure is complaining about? > > No, they say it will not scale very well - but I think the problem is > with Svn which is used to support SvnPubSub as each file must be > committed to svn first and then it's checked out on the webserver with > additional svn specific files. > > Anyway I've proposed something like this: > /release/1.2.x > /release/1.3.x > /release/2.0.x > /release/2.1.x > /release/2.2.x > /release/2.3.x > > and development versions > /dev/1.x > /dev/2.x > > When new version of 2.3.x branch is going to be released, it will > point to /release/2.3.x and so on. Users can always download packaged > versions of older docs. > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
