Lukasz, Please clarify - is it the idea to leave site, struts1 etc in San (agreed) or to move struts2/TRUNK *only*, that is not moving struts2/branches and struts2/tags? For the latter, I'm absolutely -1 - it's my strong opinion that we should move the full struts 2 scm repo tree, thus working in git only for all struts 2+ related development.
Cheers, René Am 13.09.2013 17:53 schrieb "Lukasz Lenart" <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > 2013/9/12 Johannes Geppert <jo...@apache.org>: > > +1 for starting with the Git migration process. > > > > What about only migrating the current svn struts2/trunk to git and leave > > the rest in the svn repository? > > > > If we need sometime also the site in git we can request a separate git > > repository like struts-site.git. > > Exactly, that's the idea :-) > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >
