2013/9/13 Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@gmail.com>: > Lukasz, > > Please clarify - is it the idea to leave site, struts1 etc in San (agreed) > or to move struts2/TRUNK *only*, that is not moving struts2/branches and > struts2/tags? For the latter, I'm absolutely -1 - it's my strong opinion > that we should move the full struts 2 scm repo tree, thus working in git > only for all struts 2+ related development.
- site stays as is for now (we will migrate it later or no) - struts1 stays as is (no further plans to move it) - struts2/branches must be cleaned up before migration - most of them are just a fast-track release branches, we don't need that anymore (delete), the rest migrate to GIT - anyway I will start additional discussion about that - struts2/tags must be moved to GIT struts2/trunk will be struts.git after migration (no version number in repository name) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
