I don't get why we wouldn't use slf4j. On Thursday, May 15, 2014, Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org> wrote:
> 2014-05-14 21:51 GMT+02:00 Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com<javascript:;> > >: > > Yes, we could use Onyx's interface mechanism, but I think SLF4j's is > > probably more stable and definitely more supported. So I'd probably > > recommend that we extract the SLF4j support object and use it directly > (or > > at least make it the default). If it's something that you're interested > > in, I'd have to fill out the forms to become a committer on Struts. > Where > > would I find that information? > > I'm not sure if this the right move, switching to SLF4j over our > custom solution. Please can we explore this topic a bit? > > The first step to become a committer is to fill ICLA > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org <javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org <javascript:;> > >
